<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.progressiveroundtable.org">
<channel>
 <title>Progressive Roundtable - Roundtable Forums</title>
 <link>http://www.progressiveroundtable.org/taxonomy/term/36/all</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Can we economize on market segmentation?</title>
 <link>http://www.progressiveroundtable.org/node/224</link>
 <description>To what degree might it be possible to use characterizations of market segments that were intended for commercial/product purposes for reaching and moving a given audience toward a more progressive position over time?  

As a corollary, to what degree might it be possible to use characterizations of market segments that were intended for get out the vote efforts for reaching and moving a given audience toward a more progressive position over time?  

I ask, because segmentation research is expensive, and we may be able to economize if we can build upon what&#039;s already been done.</description>
 <category domain="http://www.progressiveroundtable.org/taxonomy/term/7">Marketing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressiveroundtable.org/taxonomy/term/43">Marketing</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:06:01 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Communicating to market segments</title>
 <link>http://www.progressiveroundtable.org/node/223</link>
 <description>Assuming that we identify the issue or issues that are most important to a given market segment, e.g., Latinos between the ages of 18 and 26, what processes might be best for identifying the media, other than major media, that most effectively targets this audience?</description>
 <category domain="http://www.progressiveroundtable.org/taxonomy/term/44">Communications</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressiveroundtable.org/taxonomy/term/46">Communication</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:27:33 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Long-Term Strategy</title>
 <link>http://www.progressiveroundtable.org/node/198</link>
 <description>Check out new article by Leonard Salle in Resource Library, Strategy section.</description>
 <category domain="http://www.progressiveroundtable.org/taxonomy/term/45">Strategy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressiveroundtable.org/taxonomy/term/47">Strategy</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 18:07:38 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Coordination Capacity Needs - new article</title>
 <link>http://www.progressiveroundtable.org/node/197</link>
 <description>Several of us have just posted an article, &quot;Coordination: Capacity Needs,&quot; in the coordination section of the Resource Library. We would appreciate your thoughts and suggestions. Also let us know whether you think this should continue to be restricted to Roundtable members at this point, or made available to non-member site visitors. </description>
 <category domain="http://www.progressiveroundtable.org/taxonomy/term/8">Coordination</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressiveroundtable.org/taxonomy/term/42">Coordination</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 17:50:44 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Global Priorities - 10-yr &amp; 3-yr goals</title>
 <link>http://www.progressiveroundtable.org/node/190</link>
 <description>What do you think are important, yet achievable, 10-year (2016) and 3-year (2009) goals for the Global Interdependence issue area?  Keep in mind that an important goal might be changing certain public attitudes that are relevant to this issue. You may get some thoughts from the papers in the Resource Library that are based on the public opinion research and framing work of the Global Interdependence Initiative (GII).</description>
 <category domain="http://www.progressiveroundtable.org/taxonomy/term/35">Global Interdependence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressiveroundtable.org/taxonomy/term/37">Global Interdependence</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2006 18:05:07 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Energy/Global Warming Priorities - 10-yr &amp; 3-yr goals</title>
 <link>http://www.progressiveroundtable.org/node/189</link>
 <description>What do you think are important, yet achievable, 10-year (2016) and 3-year (2009) goals for the Energy/Global Warming issue area?  Keep in mind that an important goal might be changing certain public attitudes that are relevant to this issue.</description>
 <category domain="http://www.progressiveroundtable.org/taxonomy/term/39">Energy / Global Warming</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressiveroundtable.org/taxonomy/term/5">Energy/Global Warming</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2006 18:03:41 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Education priorities - 10-yr &amp; 3-yr goals</title>
 <link>http://www.progressiveroundtable.org/node/188</link>
 <description>What do you think are important, yet achievable, 10-year (2016) and 3-year (2009) goals for the Public Education issue area?  Keep in mind that an important goal might be changing certain public attitudes that are relevant to this issue.</description>
 <category domain="http://www.progressiveroundtable.org/taxonomy/term/6">Public Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressiveroundtable.org/taxonomy/term/40">Public Education</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2006 18:01:53 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Top priorities - 10-yr and 3-yr goals</title>
 <link>http://www.progressiveroundtable.org/node/183</link>
 <description>What do you think are important, yet achievable, 10-year (2016) and 3-year (2009) goals for the Role of Government issue area?  Keep in mind that an important goal might be changing certain public attitudes that are relevant to this issue.</description>
 <category domain="http://www.progressiveroundtable.org/taxonomy/term/4">Role of Government</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressiveroundtable.org/taxonomy/term/41">Role of Government</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2006 13:40:59 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What is currently being done with Frameworks&#039; findings for the GII?</title>
 <link>http://www.progressiveroundtable.org/node/150</link>
 <description>The Frameworks Institute did extensive communications research for the Global Interdependence Initiative (GII), starting in 1999 (see the Progressive Roundtable Resource Library).  Educational materials Frameworks created were made available to the GII member organizations. What has happened as a result of all this work? Are there any current ongoing efforts? Any outcome measures? </description>
 <category domain="http://www.progressiveroundtable.org/taxonomy/term/35">Global Interdependence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressiveroundtable.org/taxonomy/term/37">Global Interdependence</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:26:24 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Public segmentation re: energy &amp; global warming</title>
 <link>http://www.progressiveroundtable.org/node/148</link>
 <description>I think we will need to move broad public opinion on energy/global warming, because broad, bipartisan support will be needed to make changes at local, state, or national levels. After all, to deal with this issue and its repercussions (effects of global warming, transportation, weather instability, famines, etc.), we are talking about major changes in how our society works. 

Which population segments should we address first?  Are there market research data, particularly values or psychographic segmentation combined with KAP (knowledge, attitudes, practices) to inform this decision?</description>
 <category domain="http://www.progressiveroundtable.org/taxonomy/term/39">Energy / Global Warming</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressiveroundtable.org/taxonomy/term/5">Energy/Global Warming</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:03:59 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What do you most want to get out of the Progressive Roundtable process?</title>
 <link>http://www.progressiveroundtable.org/node/72</link>
 <description>Please take a moment to share what you would most like to get out of the Progressive Roundtable conference and process.</description>
 <category domain="http://www.progressiveroundtable.org/taxonomy/term/38">Roundtable General Discussion</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 01:45:29 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
